Page: 1
/ 14
Total 47 questions
SAP P_SAPEA_2023 SAP Certified Professional - SAP Enterprise Architect Exam Practice Test
Question 1
Having identified the appropriate sel of Business Activities, as the Chief Enterprise Architect of Wanderlust, assisted by the sap Enterprise Architects. you have been trying to relate to Lead to Cash Business Capabilities in the SAP Reference Business Architecture content repository. In light of the two key goals outlined by the Wanderlust CIO, what are the most appropriate Business Capabilities? Note: There are 3 correct answers to this question.
Answer : A, C, D
The business capabilities 'Marketing Analytics' and 'Recommendation Management' align with the goal of enhancing the number of leads through targeted campaigns and cross-selling opportunities. 'Marketing Campaign Management' is central to designing and executing effective campaigns. 'Social Media Management' is pivotal for achieving high visibility on platforms where potential customers are most active. Reference = These capabilities should be part of Wanderlust's business architecture to support the CIO's objectives, and they are likely detailed in the SAP Reference Business Architecture content, which includes capabilities needed to execute comprehensive marketing strategies.
Question 2
Tho Wanderlust CIO wants to focus loss on marketing strategy and planning, to instead prioritize marketing implement goals in mind to enhance number of leads generated:
* Run effective and highly visible campaigns (for example. on social media)
* Increase cross selling opportunities through online recommendation
AS the Chief Enterprise Architect Of Wanderlust. assisted by the SAP Enterprise Architects, you have been trying to re
goals with the Business Process Modules, Segments and Activities in the Lead to Cash B2C Business Process Varia Business Architecture content repository (see graphic below).
What are relevant combinations Of business activities and goals based on the graphic below?
Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
See the Image
Answer : B, C
The business activities 'Analyze and respond to customer insight' and 'Implement promotional activities' directly relate to the CIO's goals of increasing cross-selling opportunities through online recommendations and running highly visible campaigns. Analyzing customer insights can provide data that enhances recommendation engines, leading to effective cross-selling. Implementing promotional activities, particularly in high-visibility platforms like social media, is key to driving campaign effectiveness. Reference = These relationships between business activities and goals would be informed by best practices in online marketing strategies, as documented within the Lead to Cash - B2C Business Process Variant.
Question 3
The online marketing channel is targeted only to individual customers, who should be able to choose any of the 50 combinations that Wanderlust offers for its electric cars. Every confirmed online order must be first checked for ready stock availability and, if unavailable, must go for production scheduling. As Chief Enterprise Architect of Wanderlust, along with the SAP Enterprise Architect, you have identified Lead to Cash (L2C) as the key E2E process. However, you have found out that the SAP Reference Business Architecture content has several Business Process Variants of the L2C process, from which you are supposed to choose one suitable variant for Wanderlust's product range and business model. Which of the following combinations of L2C Business Process Variants and business reasons are the most suitable? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
Answer : A, D
Considering Wanderlust's product range and business model, which targets individual customers and offers a wide range of electric car combinations, the Lead to Cash-B2C with Make to Stock variant would be suitable for orders that can be met from existing stock. Similarly, the Lead to Cash-B2C with Make to Order variant would fit the business model when an individual customer orders a combination not available in stock, necessitating production scheduling. Both variants cater to the business-to-consumer (B2C) model and account for the direct sales approach to individual customers. Reference = These variants would be documented in SAP's Business Process Architecture content, which includes various Lead to Cash process scenarios, adjusted for different business contexts.
Question 4
Which programming model would you suggest that ABAP developers use when SAP extensions should be built following the clean-core strategy?
Answer : C
For ABAP developers looking to build SAP extensions that adhere to the clean-core strategy, the recommended programming model is the RESTful Application Programming (RAP) model. RAP is designed specifically for developing SAP Fiori applications and services with a focus on maintaining a clean and stable core while allowing for extensions.
RESTful Application Programming (RAP) offers a modern ABAP programming model that supports development both in the cloud and on-premise. It is centered around services that are exposed through RESTful APIs, making it ideal for creating clean, decoupled extensions that do not interfere with the core S/4HANA system. This approach supports the clean-core strategy by enabling developers to create extensions that communicate with the core system via stable, well-defined APIs without modifying the core system itself.
Option A, SAP Cloud Application Programming (CAP), although a robust model for cloud-native application development, is not specific to ABAP and does not inherently align with the ABAP developer environment. Option B, the SAP Classic Extensibility model, often involves direct modifications to the core system, which contradicts the principles of the clean-core strategy.
SAP documentation on RESTful Application Programming Model.
SAP community articles and guides on developing with RAP.
Question 5
Which integration styles does SAP's Integration Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) cover in general?
Answer : B
The Integration Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) is a framework that helps organizations to design, build, and manage their integration landscape. ISA-M covers a wide range of integration styles, including:
Process Integration:This style of integration involves the integration of business processes across different systems and applications.
Data Integration:This style of integration involves the integration of data from different sources into a single data repository.
Analytics Integration:This style of integration involves the integration of data from different sources for the purpose of analytics.
User Integration:This style of integration involves the integration of user interfaces from different systems and applications.
Thing Integration:This style of integration involves the integration of things, such as sensors and actuators, with other systems and applications.
ISA-M also includes a number of other integration styles, such as event-driven integration, service-oriented integration, and enterprise application integration.
By covering a wide range of integration styles, ISA-M provides organizations with a flexible framework that can be used to meet their specific integration needs.
Process Integration: This integration style enables end-to-end business processes across different applications and systems, such as SAP S/4HANA, SAP SuccessFactors, or third-party solutions. Process integration typically involves orchestrating or choreographing multiple services or APIs to achieve a business outcome.
Data Integration: This integration style enables data exchange and synchronization between different data sources and targets, such as SAP HANA, SAP Data Warehouse Cloud, or third-party databases. Data integration typically involves extracting, transforming, and loading (ETL) data to support analytical or operational scenarios.
Analytics Integration: This integration style enables data visualization and exploration across different data sources and targets, such as SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BusinessObjects BI Platform, or third-party tools. Analytics integration typically involves creating dashboards, reports, or stories to provide insights and recommendations for decision making.
User Integration: This integration style enables user interaction and collaboration across different applications and systems, such as SAP Fiori Launchpad, SAP Jam, or third-party portals. User integration typically involves creating consistent and seamless user experiences that integrate multiple UI technologies and frameworks.
Thing Integration: This integration style enables device connectivity and management across different applications and systems, such as SAP IoT, SAP Edge Services, or third-party platforms. Thing integration typically involves connecting physical devices or sensors to the cloud or the edge and enabling data ingestion, processing, and action.
Question 6
Green Elk & Company is the world's leading manufacturer of agricultural and forestry machinery. The former company slogan "Elk always runs" has recently been changed to "Elk feeds the world" One of Green Elk's strategic goals is to increase its revenue in the emerging markets of China, India and other parts of Asia by 80 % within three years. This requires a new business model that caters to significantly smaller farms with limited budgets The CIO asks you, the Chief Enterprise Architect, to present an architecture vision to address the aforementioned business challenge. According to the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework, what is the best approach?
Answer : B
According to the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework, the best approach to addressing a business challenge through an architecture vision would be:
Identify the stakeholders, their concerns, and business requirements to create a comprehensive stakeholder map. This step is crucial to ensure that the architecture will address the needs of all parties involved.
Confirm and elaborate on business goals, business drivers, and constraints to clearly understand the objectives and limitations that the architecture must operate within.
Evaluate the enterprise capabilities and assess the readiness for business transformation to determine if the organization has the necessary resources, processes, and technology to support the new business model and achieve the strategic goals.
This method ensures that the architecture vision is aligned with the business strategy, that stakeholder needs are adequately addressed, and that the company is prepared for the changes that will come with the new business model.
Reference = These steps are foundational to the SAP Enterprise Architecture Framework process and are detailed in SAP's EA documentation, particularly in the sections concerning the development of an architecture vision aligned with business strategy.
Question 7
Your company adapts SAP's Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M) as an Integration Solution Playbook. In your role as Lead Enterprise Architect, you are asked to decide which integration approach to take for this solution. Which of the following approaches is recommended by SAP ISA-M for identifying an integration solution and strategy?
Answer : C
The best answer for the integration approach to take for this solution isC. According to the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M), which is a methodology offered by SAP that helps enterprise architects define an integration strategy for their organizations and derive related integration guidelines, the recommended approach for identifying an integration solution and strategy is:
Document and review the existing integration (architecture). This step involves documenting and analyzing the current state of the integration landscape, including the integration scenarios, technologies, patterns, standards, and governance processes. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the existing integration (architecture) and identify the gaps and improvement areas.
Scope focus areas, for example future required building blocks. This step involves defining and prioritizing the focus areas for the integration project, such as new or changed business requirements, integration scenarios, or technologies. The focus areas are derived from the gaps and improvement areas identified in the previous step, as well as from the business goals and drivers of the organization. The focus areas are also mapped to future required building blocks, which are logical components that represent the desired capabilities or functionalities of the integration solution.
Identify architecture relevant use-cases (technology agnostic/clustered in use-case patterns). This step involves identifying and describing the use-cases that are relevant for the integration project, such as process integration, data integration, user integration, or thing integration. The use-cases are technology agnostic, meaning that they do not specify any particular technology or service for implementation. The use-cases are also clustered in use-case patterns, which are generic templates that capture the common characteristics and requirements of similar use-cases.
Map these use case patterns to integration technology. This step involves mapping the use-case patterns to suitable integration technologies or services that can implement them. The mapping is based on a set of criteria and decision tables that consider various aspects of the use-case patterns, such as complexity, performance, security, or scalability. The mapping also takes into account the existing or planned integration technologies or services in the organization's landscape.
Define Integration Best Practices. This step involves defining and documenting the best practices and guidelines for designing, developing, testing, deploying, monitoring, and governing the integration solutions. The best practices and guidelines are based on SAP's recommendations and industry standards, as well as on the organization's specific needs and preferences. The best practices and guidelines also cover various aspects of the integration project, such as naming conventions, error handling, logging, tracing, or versioning.
Enable a Practice of Empowerment. This step involves enabling and empowering the different roles and personas involved in the integration project, such as integration architects, developers, testers, operators, or business users. The goal is to foster a culture of collaboration and innovation among the stakeholders, and to provide them with the necessary skills, tools, and resources to execute their tasks effectively and efficiently.
The other options (A and B) are not correct for the integration approach to take for this solution, because they either skip or misrepresent some of the steps in the SAP Integration Solution Advisory Methodology (ISA-M). For example:
Option A is not correct because it does not include identifying architecture relevant use-cases (technology agnostic/clustered in use-case patterns), which is a key step to define and categorize the integration requirements in a generic way. It also does not include enabling a practice of empowerment, which is a key step to ensure the success and sustainability of the integration project.
Option B is not correct because it does not include documenting and reviewing the existing integration (architecture), which is a key step to understand the current state of the integration landscape and identify the gaps and improvement areas. It also does not include scoping focus areas or mapping use case patterns to integration technology, which are key steps to define and prioritize the future state of the integration solution.
All Official Question Types