Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibits.
A business analyst must add a list of temporary employees (interns) to the current sales app. The app contains an existing employees table. When the business analyst profiles the data, the association view displays possible associations as shown.
Which action should the business analyst take in Data manager to meet the requirements?
Answer : D
The InternEmp table contains information about temporary employees (interns), and the Employees table contains regular employee data. To properly link these two tables, the business analyst needs to create an association between the EmpID in the InternEmp table and the EmployeeID in the Employees table. This will ensure that the two tables are correctly associated based on the employee identifiers, allowing the system to relate both tables in the data model.
Key Concepts:
Association: Qlik Sense automatically suggests associations between tables based on field names. By linking EmpID from InternEmp with EmployeeID from Employees, the tables can be properly related in the data model.
Association View: The association view in Data Manager helps visualize how tables are connected and suggests appropriate links between tables based on common fields.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Create a concatenated key: Concatenation is unnecessary for this scenario since the data model relies on direct associations between keys.
B . Concatenate the tables: Concatenating the InternEmp table into the Employees table would combine the records, but it's not appropriate since the two tables should remain separate entities.
C . Force an association between InternEmp and Orders: There's no need to associate InternEmp with Orders directly since the focus is on employees and interns.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Field Associations in Qlik Sense: Properly associating fields between tables is crucial for building a clean and efficient data model in Qlik Sense.
Thus, creating an association between EmpID and EmployeeID is the best approach, making D the correct answer.
A customer needs to distribute sales data to a variety of teams. The internal analyst team requires a global view of dat
a. The sales team requires mobile device access.
Which solution will meet the needs of both teams?
Answer : B
To meet the needs of both the internal analyst team and the sales team, the best solution is to create two separate apps: one designed specifically for mobile use and another for internal use. Mobile devices require different UI considerations, such as simpler, touch-optimized layouts, while the internal team can benefit from a more detailed app optimized for desktop use. Designing separate apps ensures that both teams have a tailored experience that suits their specific devices and use cases.
Key Concepts:
Mobile Optimization: Mobile devices require apps that are streamlined and optimized for smaller screens, while internal users on desktop computers can handle more complex layouts and detailed reports.
Separate Apps: Creating separate apps ensures that each team gets the best user experience tailored to their needs.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . One app with a specific extension for mobile users: While extensions can provide some mobile functionality, they don't offer the flexibility and optimization needed for a fully mobile-friendly experience.
C . A mashup with various objects: A mashup may provide flexibility, but it could be overly complex for this requirement and wouldn't necessarily offer an optimal mobile experience.
D . One app with various objects: This could complicate the user experience for both teams, as mobile users may struggle with objects that are not optimized for their devices.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Mobile vs. Desktop App Design: Qlik Sense recommends optimizing apps for specific devices to ensure the best user experience for both desktop and mobile users.
Thus, B is the correct answer because it provides the best solution for both the mobile sales team and the internal analyst team, making it the verified answer.
A company has sales data where every Customer ID can be assigned to one or more Sales Account ID. Sales Accounts are assigned to one of eight Groups. The business analyst is creating an app with the following requirements:
* Each Group should have a separate sheet
* The Sales Account can only see its own customers
* The Sales Account can navigate only to the sheet for the Group assigned
The business analyst has created a Section Access table, in which each Sales Account ID is assigned their CustomerlDs. Which action should the business analyst take next?
Answer : C
The most effective way to control sheet access based on group assignment is to use the Group field in the Section Access table and apply it to the show/hide condition of the sheets. Each Sales Account ID is already mapped to a Group, so the business analyst can use this Group field to dynamically control which sheets are visible based on the user's Group assignment. This ensures that each Sales Account only sees their respective Group's sheet.
Key Concepts:
Section Access with Groups: By incorporating the Group field into Section Access, the analyst can restrict sheet visibility based on group membership.
Show/Hide Condition: This feature in Qlik Sense allows certain sheets or objects to be displayed or hidden based on conditions, in this case, the user's group.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Sales Account ID as a filter: The Sales Account ID is used for data filtering but is not the appropriate condition for controlling sheet visibility.
B . Group as a filter on the sheet: While Group can be used as a condition, it must be managed through Section Access to ensure proper visibility control.
D . OSUser() function: While OSUser() can capture the user's login information, using the Group field in Section Access is more efficient for controlling access to specific sheets based on group assignments.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Show/Hide Sheets Based on Section Access: Qlik Sense supports the use of Section Access for controlling access to sheets based on user roles and group assignments.
Thus, C is the most appropriate solution because it uses the Group field within Section Access to control sheet visibility, making it the correct answer.
A company CFO has requested an app that contains visualizations applicable to analyzing the finance dat
a. Each regional finance team will analyze their data and should only have access to the data in their region. The app must contain a high-level sheet that navigates to relevant detail sheets.
Which features support a logical design structure?
Answer : A
To fulfill the CFO's request for an app that allows each regional finance team to access only their data while navigating from a high-level sheet to detail sheets, the combination of a dashboard of KPIs and Section Access is ideal. A dashboard of KPIs provides high-level insights, and Section Access ensures that users from different regions can only see the data relevant to their region. Section Access allows for controlled access to data, ensuring data security and segregation.
Key Concepts:
Dashboard of KPIs: A dashboard displaying key performance indicators (KPIs) gives a high-level overview of financial data, allowing users to quickly assess critical metrics.
Section Access: This Qlik Sense feature controls data access based on user roles, ensuring that users only have access to the data relevant to their region.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
B . Pivot table: A pivot table is useful for detailed analysis but not suitable for designing a navigation structure or controlling access to data by region.
C . Multi KPI with set analysis: While set analysis can filter data, it doesn't control access at the regional level as effectively as Section Access.
D . Dashboard with regional bookmarks: Bookmarks are user-specific and do not offer security or access control, which is required in this scenario.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Section Access for Regional Data Control: Qlik Sense recommends Section Access for managing data access when different users need to see only specific subsets of data.
Thus, A is the best solution because it combines high-level KPIs with robust data access controls using Section Access, making it the correct answer.
A business analyst needs to build a chart that enables users to analyze the correlation between the following measures for all products:
* Product Sales ($)
* Order Volume
* Margin%
Which visualization should the business analyst use?
Answer : C
A scatter plot is the most appropriate visualization for analyzing the correlation between Product Sales ($), Order Volume, and Margin %. Scatter plots are ideal for showing relationships between two or more continuous variables, which is crucial for identifying trends or correlations among these measures.
Key Concepts:
Scatter Plot: This chart type is specifically designed to display correlations between measures, making it the ideal choice for visualizing relationships between Product Sales, Order Volume, and Margin %.
Multiple Measures: Scatter plots in Qlik Sense can plot two measures on the X and Y axes and can use colors or bubbles to represent additional measures (such as Margin %).
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Multi KPI: A Multi KPI displays multiple metrics but doesn't show correlations between them.
B . Combo chart: A combo chart combines bar and line charts but is not suited for analyzing correlations between multiple continuous measures.
D . Pivot table: While useful for data aggregation, a pivot table does not provide a clear visualization of correlations between measures.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Scatter Plot for Correlation Analysis: Scatter plots are recommended in Qlik Sense when exploring relationships between multiple continuous variables.
Thus, the scatter plot is the most effective visualization for analyzing the correlation between Product Sales, Order Volume, and Margin %, making C the correct answer.
An app needs to load a few hundred rows of data from a .csv text file. The file is the result of a concatenated data dump by multiple divisions across several countries. These divisions use different internal systems and processes, which causes country names to appear differently. For example, the United States of America appears in several places as 'USA', 'U.S.A.', or 'US'.
For the country dimension to work properly in the app, the naming of countries must be standardized in the data model.
Which action should the business analyst complete to address this issue?
Answer : B
In Qlik Sense, when dealing with inconsistent naming conventions across different systems or divisions (like the variation in country names), the best practice is to standardize the data during the loading process. Using a lookup table is the most efficient approach to achieve this. This involves loading a separate table that contains all variations of a country name along with the standardized version. During the load process, Qlik Sense can then map the varying names to a common value.
Key Concepts:
Lookup Table: A lookup table contains key-value pairs where different versions of a data element (like country names) are mapped to a single standard value. In this case, the lookup table could have entries like USA, U.S.A., US all mapped to United States of America.
Data Standardization: This is crucial in ensuring consistent analysis across datasets. By converting variations of country names into a single consistent value, the business analyst ensures that all data visualizations and analysis will treat 'USA', 'US', etc., as the same entity.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Create a calculated master dimension expression: While this could theoretically work by creating a calculated expression to handle variations, it's not scalable or maintainable, especially as new variations in country names could appear in future data loads.
C . Cleanse the source text file prior to loading: This option would require modifying the raw data files manually, which is time-consuming and not sustainable if data is frequently updated or if the number of variations is extensive.
D . Use the Replace option in Data manager: The Replace option in the Data Manager could work on a small scale, but it requires manual intervention each time, which is not efficient or sustainable when new data is loaded. Also, it's more useful for one-off corrections than for handling systemic issues across multiple data loads.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Data Modeling Best Practices: Lookup tables are a common approach to resolve issues of inconsistent data across multiple sources. They ensure that data is consistently represented in visualizations and reduce the need for manual intervention.
Data Cleansing During Loading: Qlik Sense allows for transformation and data cleansing during the data load process. A lookup table is part of this capability and ensures that the data loaded into the app is clean and consistent.
Using a lookup table is the most scalable and maintainable approach to standardizing country names in this scenario, which is why option B is the verified solution.
Two customers in an organization want to use an app that contains a finance data set. With different analysis objectives, each customer will only use a subset of that data. Which procedure should the business analyst follow?
Answer : B
In Qlik Sense, Set Analysis is one of the most powerful tools available to a Business Analyst for managing different subsets of data within the same app. Since both customers are working with the same finance dataset but have different objectives, creating multiple visualizations using set analysis allows the analyst to tailor the data views for each customer without duplicating the app or creating complex data models.
Key Concepts:
Set Analysis: This feature enables the creation of expressions that define subsets of data, allowing you to filter data within specific visualizations. This is ideal when multiple users need different insights from the same underlying dataset.
Flexibility: Using set analysis, you can specify conditions within individual visualizations so that each user can focus on their own segment of the data without impacting others.
Efficiency: This method avoids redundancy by ensuring you only need one app and one data model, instead of duplicating and maintaining multiple apps or applying complex logic such as Section Access.
Why the Other Options Are Less Suitable:
A . Apply Section Access: While Section Access is useful for managing security and limiting what users can see in the entire dataset, it is primarily designed to restrict data access based on user roles. In this case, both users need access to the same dataset but will conduct different analyses. Section Access would be an overly restrictive and complex solution for this scenario.
C . Duplicate and rename the apps: This is inefficient because it leads to redundancy and makes maintenance harder (e.g., any changes to the dataset or visualizations would need to be applied to both apps). It also increases the risk of inconsistencies across versions of the app.
D . Unpivot and re-associate the data tables: This option is not relevant to the problem, as unpivoting is more appropriate for transforming datasets rather than tailoring views for different users within the same app. It does not address the need for customer-specific analysis objectives.
References for Qlik Sense Business Analyst:
Set Analysis: In the Qlik Sense Business Analyst's toolkit, Set Analysis is covered as a method to manage diverse data subsets within single apps, providing the flexibility needed in multi-user environments without duplicating content.
Efficient Application Design: Best practices suggest maintaining a single app where possible to ensure consistency and ease of maintenance, which aligns with the approach of using Set Analysis.
By using Set Analysis, you provide both customers with tailored data views that are easily managed and updated within a single app. This is why option B is the most effective and verified solution.