An AEM server is overloaded with too many concurrently running workflows. The developer decides to reduce the number of concurrent workflows. What should be configured?
Answer : A
In AEM, to limit the number of concurrent workflows running at the same time, you need to adjust the Maximum Parallel Jobs setting in the OSGI console. This setting controls how many workflow jobs can be processed simultaneously, and reducing this number will lower the load on the server by limiting the number of workflows that can run concurrently.
This setting can be found under the Day CQ Workflow - Workflow Engine configuration in the OSGI Web Console.
Options B and C refer to specific workflows and threads, but they do not directly address the overall system limit on concurrent workflow executions.
Refer to the AEM documentation on workflow scaling and performance for more information on how to adjust these settings in the OSGI configuration.
A project manager wants to ensure that all documents within a certain project are shared with a designated team in Workfront What is the correct option for carrying out this action?
Answer : B
In Workfront, the best way to ensure that all documents within a project are shared with a designated team is to share the entire project. By sharing the project, all documents and related assets within that project are automatically made available to the designated team members according to the project's access permissions.
Option C is incorrect because sharing one document does not automatically inherit the same access levels for the other documents. Option A suggests linking documents from AEM, but the question pertains to sharing documents within Workfront itself.
Refer to Workfront's documentation on document sharing for detailed instructions on how to share all project-related assets with teams.
A customer finds an Ul issue with component (/apps/
How should the developer deploy the change to an AEM Cloud Service production environment?
Answer : A
In AEM Cloud Service, the correct approach to making changes, even urgent ones, is to update the codebase and deploy it through the Cloud Manager pipeline. This ensures that the change is part of the version-controlled, immutable repository and follows best practices for deployment.
Immutable infrastructure: AEMaaCS does not allow direct modifications to production environments (e.g., via CRXDE Lite). All changes must be deployed through Cloud Manager, ensuring consistency and traceability.
Making changes directly on production via CRXDE or deploying one-off fixes using the Package Manager (Options B and C) violates AEMaaCS's immutable infrastructure principle and is not supported.
Refer to Adobe Cloud Manager's documentation for best practices on deploying urgent fixes in AEM as a Cloud Service.
A customer wants to support translations on AEM Cloud Service environment. They have an existing third party vendor who will provide a pre-build package that must be deployed to AEM so it can be leveraged as port of the workflow process.
How should the developer deploy this third party library onto AEM Cloud Service?
Answer : A
In Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) as a Cloud Service, deployments are handled through Cloud Manager, and all code, including third-party libraries, must be part of the versioned code repository. To deploy the third-party package provided by the vendor, it needs to be included as part of the AEM project's codebase under the install folder within the repository:
The package should be stored in the <url>file;$(maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory)/install</url> directory.
Once stored, the deployment will be handled through Cloud Manager's deployment pipeline.
This ensures the third-party package is included in the standard deployment process and follows AEMaaCS's immutable infrastructure model, which ensures that changes to environments are made only through deployments using Cloud Manager.
Option B is incorrect because installing a package directly to production via CRX Package Manager is not allowed in AEM as a Cloud Service. Option C would work for self-hosted AEM instances but not for AEMaaCS, where dependencies must be part of the Maven build.
For more information, refer to AEMaaCS deployment best practices and the Cloud Manager documentation.
For a customer, the local deployment process needs to differ from Cloud Manager. A developer wants to execute maven profile for the Cloud Manager deployment pipeline only Which configuration should the developer use?
A)
B)
C)
Answer : C
In the given scenario, the developer needs to execute a Maven profile specifically for the Cloud Manager deployment pipeline. This requires the use of a property that is exclusive to Cloud Manager, allowing the profile to activate only when the build is being executed in the Cloud Manager environment.
Option C uses the correct activation property:
<name>env.cloudmanager</name>
This property is specific to Adobe's Cloud Manager environment, ensuring that this Maven profile will only be activated during Cloud Manager deployments. This allows the local deployment process to remain unaffected while the correct profile is triggered in Cloud Manager.
Options A and B use other properties (env.CM_BUILD or CM_BUILD) that are not standard or specific to the Cloud Manager environment, making them incorrect choices.
For more details, you can refer to Adobe's Cloud Manager Maven Configuration documentation, which outlines how to configure Maven profiles specifically for Cloud Manager's deployment pipelines.
A user wants to send a new version of a document they have uploaded to Workfront (o make sure that this latest version is now available in Adobe Experience Manager Assets. This document has previously been uploaded into both Workfront and the AEM.
How should the user accomplish this?
Answer : B
To upload a new version of a document and ensure it is available in AEM Assets, the user must select the New Version option in Workfront. This triggers the version control process where the updated file can be uploaded.
By choosing the Experience Manager integration after selecting New Version, the system ensures that the latest version of the document is sent to AEM Assets, where it will replace the previous version without losing version history.
This workflow supports maintaining version control between Workfront and AEM, ensuring that the most current version of the asset is always available in both systems.
Refer to the Workfront-AEM Enhanced Connector Guide for further details on version control and document updates between Workfront and AEM.
Metadata mappings between Adobe Workfront and the AEM have been configured A user wants to send a document and its metadata from Adobe Workfront to Adobe Experience Manager Assets.
How should the user accomplish this?
Answer : B
When metadata mappings between Adobe Workfront and AEM are configured, the process of sending a document along with its metadata from Workfront to Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Assets is streamlined. The user selects the document in Workfront, clicks 'Send to,' and chooses the Experience Manager integration.
The metadata fields that have been mapped are automatically synchronized along with the document. There is no need for manual selection of metadata at this stage, as the integration ensures that all configured mappings are applied.
This functionality is part of the enhanced connector, which simplifies the workflow between Workfront and AEM Assets by automating the synchronization of mapped metadata fields during the document transfer.
For more details, refer to Adobe's documentation on Workfront for Experience Manager Enhanced Connector, which outlines how automatic metadata synchronization works during document transfers.